August 2009 Archives

The LiveSmart program not only includes energy audits of homes, but then helps fund improvements to those homes - doors, windows, insulation, more efficient furnaces etc

Both he majority of the products and the jobs are local - not simply creating a flood of cheap imports.

Surely a measly $60m can be found to continue this 'too popular' initiative?

Contacts to protest, complain, suggest different priorities etc:

HONOURABLE BLAIR LEKSTROM
MINISTER OF ENERGY, MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES
PO BOX 9060 STN PROV GOVT
VICTORIA BC  V8W 9E3

Telephone: 250 387-5896
Fax: 250 356-2965


Jake Jacobs Public Affairs Officer

email: Jake.Jacobs@gov.bc.ca

Telephone: 250 952-0628 Fax: 250 952-0627

Slimy 'target met' BC government press release here

From the Globe and Mail BC section

BRENNAN CLARKE

VICTORIA -- Special to The Globe and Mail

Companies specializing in green energy solutions are seeing red over the cancellation of LiveSmart BC, a move they say will hurt the province's burgeoning green industry sector and undermine the Campbell government's efforts to cut greenhouse-gas emissions.

Cancelled without warning late last week, LiveSmart BC offered a range of cash incentives for homeowners who invest in energy-saving technology.

Among the hardest hit will be firms that make and install "Energy Star" windows, a rating that entitled homeowners to a $30-per-window rebate.

The demise of LiveSmart is part two of a double whammy for makers of eco-friendly products that will lose their provincial sales tax exemption when BC adopts the harmonized sales tax next July 1.

"It affects 100 per cent of our business. All we sell is Energy Star windows," said Mark Brandow, sales manager for Centra Windows, a $16-million company with outlets across southern B.C.

"All my second- and third-quarter promotions are geared toward the LiveSmart program. Our phones have been ringing off the hook with customers who have either just signed their contracts or were thinking of going ahead."

Companies that sell and install heat pumps, the cleanest and most efficient alternative to conventional (electric, oil and gas) heating systems, were shocked by the program's end.

Wendy Wilson-Storey of CoolFlame Home Heating in Nanaimo said LiveSmart offered rebates of up to $1,420 on the estimated $6,000 cost of replacing a conventional furnace with a heat pump.

"It's not good news. We've been swamped with work in the last couple of months, but after that runs out who knows how people will react?" Ms. Wilson-Storey said.

"[The rebate] was a great motivator for people to go green."

Ms. Wilson-Storey also spoke to the second half of the one-two punch, the new harmonized sales tax: "Right now you don't have to pay PST on heat pumps, so there's another 7 per cent when the HST kicks in."

Consulting firms offering home energy "audits" are also feeling the heat, said Peter Sundberg, executive director of City Green Solutions, a Victoria-based non-profit that promotes energy efficiency programs.

To qualify for energy-retrofit rebates, LiveSmart required homeowners to undergo a $300 initial assessment of their home's energy efficiency, $150 of which was reimbursed by the province.

Over the past year, City Green has been doing "500 to 600" energy audits a month. Mr. Sundberg, who has 22 employees, is anticipating a "25- to 50-per-cent" drop in those numbers.

"City Green is going to be hit hard, but we have other things going on so we will fare better than the others," Mr. Sundberg said. "Energy audits are about 60 per cent of what we do."

Energy and Mines Minister Blair Lekstrom said Friday thatLiveSmart B.C. was a "victim of its own success," devouring its $60-million funding allocation in just over 15 months, far faster than the government anticipated.


smallheavylifter.jpg











This photograph and article is from the Vancouver Sun on Wednesday 19th 2009.

It shows 3 new Quad cranes arriving at Deltaport. The cranes were made in China and transported by a Chinese ship.

So we are importing from the exporters the means to import from the exporters.

Whither lessons from British colonial history?

The trinkets and baubles imported from China filling every store and sometimes whole malls are all price driven, never directed by quality or ethics - ethics both in terms of buying local and the exploitation of the workers in China making this crap.

In order to keep up with demand (read addiction) for this low cost unethical crap, China is demanding more and more energy, including coal from Canada.

Add to the story above the recent announcement of the Chinese government investment of C$1.74 Billion in Teck Resources - it's all about cheap coal - three stories here:

Flaherty and the Bloomberg article on the Teck Deal

Full story fom CEO world here

Vancouver Sun piece via Reuters criticizes China for the weakness of the bid - not ruthless enough...!

Teck-Resources-Ltd.jpg


What this really looks like - Canada ripping itself apart to provide energy to China to pollute at will while producing unnecessary goods to fuel Canadian obsession with 'drive to the bottom' wages. Can you say Walmart, Costco and a hundred other retailers without a trace of moral fibre selling this crap to a million consumers without a trace of moral fibre.

Exploitation is apparently fine as long as we don't have to see it - either as in the picture above or in the sweat shops where our 'low cost' (cost to whom?) goods are made.

coaltruck.jpg




















This is what China wants - coal - which if burned here is 'bad', which if exported to China and burned is apparently 'good', firstly because it creates Canadian jobs, and secondly keeps the stream of slave labour produced trinkets going. A stream which destroyed Canadian jobs in the first place.

How many cloth bags (99% made in China btw) will it take to wipe out or equalize the CO2 produced by this coal when it is burned in China with few environmental cares?

Sickening all round.

1./ Read the label - stop buying Chinese made goods

2./ Repeat above

3./ Buy fewer goods of better quality from producers who value their tradition, their quality and their workers - preferably from the country where you live to keep local jobs for local people.

These are the ways to reduce the Chinese demand for Canadian coal, fueling this disgusting mess.

Critical of Critical Mass cyclists?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
<Critical Mass is a monthly cycle ride in Vancouver, growing in popularity each month, which has start points and a destination but no planned route between these.>

So let me get this straight. The gasoline addicted drivers, the Mayor (Happy Planet) and the Chief of Police (I see a stapler) don't like the once a month Critical Mass bike ride because it is not formally organized, doesn't post its route in advance, may delay the journeys of others and can cause tension with other road users.

What exactly then is the twice daily car commute? Drivers in their tens of thousands leave their houses without posting a formal route, join in what is essentially a huge game of follow my leader without any rules, able to change direction and route without any consultation, cause massive gridlock, pollution and delays for others, and slow down or endanger travellers using other modes of movement.

This lemming like event happens twice a day, every working day and yet is seen as normal. Isn't this the point of the Critical Mass monthly ride? By reducing the situation to the absurd it forces us to reconsider what we see as normal, and view car obsession and commuting as repetitive, thoughtless and addicted behaviour.

Imagine the response if car drivers ('...because there are so many involved...') had to post their routes in advance, keep the police informed of their overall intentions, identify leaders, and enter into discussions with the authorities about the effect of their journeys on other road users.

Sort of harm reduction for gasoline addicts. Sounds fine to me.